Thank you for the chanting and the cheering and the commiserating! My numbers are just peachy keen, nothing that even hyper-anxious me can get worried about.
For the historical record:
FSH, 6.5. Below 10 is considered good. Under 6 would be superstar, but 6.5 is juuuuust fine with me.
Estradiol, 52. Below 80 is good.
LH, 5.9. Over three and yet lower than FSH is good.
Ratio of FSH:LH is 1.1. Over 2 predicts badness. 1.1 is ducky.
I know exactly what my doctor would say (I think I'll call him Dr. Stewart, because he totally reminds me of Jon Stewart). He'd say "What we know here is only that this blood test does not show any of the markers associated with diminished ovarian reserve." He would then quickly point out that we know nothing about the quality of my eggs, response to stimulation, etc. After my HSG he was careful to state that tubal patency does not mean anything except that dye moves freely through and then spills from the fallopian tubes.
Can you see why I like him? No? Well, I do. His downbeat approach makes me feel positively blithe and reckless in comparison. I don't particularly want a doctor who radiates positivity. REs are in the business of selling an expensive, invasive procedure that doesn't work more often than it does. A little bit of negativity feels like honesty to me.
I start pills tonight.